Following from the last article on the definition of Reward, I'll first like to clarify that the article sets to define and not to refute the use of Rewards to incentivize consumer behavior. I am myself a large advocate of the use of rewards to achieve marketing bottom line. Simply looking at TuxSeeDo, it's not disguise that the product has a huge reward element to it. Before discussing about the effective use of rewards and its impact, I'll briefly cover the definitions of Engagement and Loyalty. We can further discuss more practical applications of REAL to improve marketing efficiency. The idea here being to maximize bottom line results on marketing campaigns.
What is Engagement? Without the use of convoluted matrixes, graphs and charts that modern marketing studies bring about. I'll like to simply define it with 2 factors. Frequency and Time Spent.
Frequency being the more straight forward of the two being how often does your audience interact with your brand. You may not visit your dentist or buy new clothes everyday but as frequently as you think about your teeth and need fashion advice, where do you go. You kind of get the point that interaction with a brand does not only occur at point of sale or even just before or after the sales. It happens as a day to day activity, even with something as simple as viewing the Calvin Klein ad while traveling to work on the bus. Here's some old(2005) findings about media interactions that an average person interacts with on a daily basis.
- About 30 percent of the observed waking day was spent with media as the sole activity versus 20.8 percent for work activity, while an additional 39 percent of the day was spent with media while involved in some other activity
- In any given hour no less than 30 percent of those studied were engaged in some way with television, and in some hours of the day that figure rose to 70 percent
- While television is still by far the dominant medium in terms of the time average Americans spend daily with media at 240.9 minutes, the computer has emerged as the second most significant media device at about 120 minutes
- About 30 percent of all media time is spent exposed to more than one medium at a time
- People ages 18 to 24 spend less time online than any other age group except those older than 65
- Levels of concurrent media exposure were higher among those 40 to 65 than people 18 to 39
- Women spend more time multitasking with two or more types of media than men
- Use of the Web, e-mail and phones is substantially higher on Fridays than any other day of the week
Though I believe that some of this information is outdated (like I seriously doubt point 3 still applies, especially with Facebook and iPhones), the average individual spends so much time interacting with various media that marketing budgets are in the billions of dollars just so that brands can maximise frequency of interactions, until... they realise there's a better way to do it (read: P&G To Lay Off 1,600 After Discovering It's Free To Advertise On Facebook). And so we have the likes of Fan pages on Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare and every social platform you can think of and viral campaigns of photos, videos, memes of all kinds circulating all as part of marketing.
Besides the frequency, there is the Time Spent. From a web analytics point of view, you don't just want to ask how often a user comes back to your site, you also want to ask how much time they spend on your site and if they are commenting or simply reading. I'll like to put an emphasis on time on site rather than the action of commenting or simply viewing. While some may argue that a user that a user that is participating is better engaged than one who is just viewing. While in some sense true, I'll like to classify that action of participation with "vested interest" later covered with loyalty. A user who has spent 15 mins reading and pondering upon your article is no less engaged than one who has spent that same 15 mins reading and writing a comment in response to your article. Would you say one who spends every hour writing an update to Facebook is more engaged than one who checks Facebook every hour to read that same update? I'll say both are equally engaged. Removing the subjective elements of types of action allows one to clearly see how effectively engaging or not a marketing action is.
Engagement, if I may put it, like a relationship. The more often you meet and the longer you spend time each time you meet the more engaged you probably are with the other party. Have better engaged customers, hence the idea is to increase the frequency and the length of each "meeting". However, more engaged does not necessarily mean more meaningful nor more involved. We will at a later article discuss ways to better engage your clients with methods including games.
During one of my early days interview, my interviewer once told me that, "A client is like your girlfriend." You've put in the right Reward to win the customer. You've put in the time to engage the relationship. Now... can you keep her?
Let me have your comments on Engagement. I'm tracking my frequency and time on site since the start of the series and I'll see if writing it has helped the engagement value of my blog. If you are wondering about the coffee vouchers, yes, I'll be honouring them at the end of the series, though I did find a small problem with the mechanics.
09 February 2012
Written by Ming